<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>http://iai.lib.wvu.edu/catalog/iai001363</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>http://iai.lib.wvu.edu/thumb/iai001363.jpg</dc:identifier><dc:title>&amp;quot;Magistrate and Finger-prints.&amp;quot;; 01 of 01</dc:title><dc:date>1906/08/01</dc:date><dc:subject>Evidence, Criminal</dc:subject><dc:subject>Fingerprints</dc:subject><dc:description>Page 10; &amp;quot;Magistrate and Finger-prints.&amp;quot;; Discusses Mr. Gillespie's opinion on the most valuable evidence being finger-marks in the housebreaking case of Crosswaite, Reed, and Walsh.; Tribune; DF 654</dc:description><dc:format>Clippings</dc:format></oai_dc:dc>